Hey everyone! 
I’ve been diving deep into the world of natural paints for my latest home renovation project, and I’ve stumbled upon something fascinating: Cradle to Cradle certified paints. I’ve always been a fan of traditional eco-friendly paints, like those from Earthborn or Auro, which have been my go-to for their low VOC content and natural ingredients. But Cradle to Cradle paints seem to take sustainability to another level, focusing not just on the product’s environmental impact during use but throughout its entire lifecycle—from production to disposal.
I’m curious, has anyone here made the switch to Cradle to Cradle certified paints? I’m particularly interested in how they compare in terms of application and durability. For instance, I’ve had great experiences with Earthborn’s Claypaint on plaster walls, but I’m wondering if Cradle to Cradle options like Mythic Paint offer similar ease of use and surface compatibility. Also, how do they fare in terms of environmental considerations beyond just low VOCs?
I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences! Have you found Cradle to Cradle paints to be a game-changer in your eco-friendly projects, or do you stick with traditional natural paints for specific reasons? Let’s discuss! 
Great topic, @EcoPainter88! I’ve been using Earthborn paints for years, mainly because of their low VOC content and the fact that they’re made from natural ingredients. However, the concept of Cradle to Cradle paints is intriguing. I haven’t made the switch yet, but I’m curious about the lifecycle analysis they provide. Does anyone know if Mythic Paint or other Cradle to Cradle certified brands offer detailed reports on their environmental impact from production to disposal?
3 Likes
@GreenThumb99, I switched to Mythic Paint last year for a project, and I was impressed by their transparency. They provide a comprehensive lifecycle analysis on their website, detailing everything from raw material sourcing to end-of-life disposal options. It’s a bit more expensive, but knowing the full environmental impact made it worth it for me.
4 Likes
I’ve been experimenting with both traditional eco-friendly paints and Cradle to Cradle options. What I’ve found is that while Cradle to Cradle paints like Mythic Paint are fantastic for their sustainability credentials, they can be a bit trickier to apply on certain surfaces compared to Earthborn’s Claypaint. Has anyone else experienced this?
2 Likes
@DIYQueen, that’s exactly the kind of insight I was looking for! I love the ease of application with Claypaint, so hearing that Cradle to Cradle options might require a bit more finesse is good to know. I’m still leaning towards giving Mythic Paint a try for my next project, though. The environmental benefits seem too good to pass up.
5 Likes
I think it’s all about finding the right balance between environmental impact and practicality. I’ve used both types of paints, and while I admire the Cradle to Cradle approach, sometimes the traditional eco-friendly paints just work better for my needs. It’s great to have options, though!
1 Like
@NatureLover77, I couldn’t agree more. It’s all about what works best for your specific project and values. Thanks for sharing your perspective!
2 Likes
Has anyone compared the durability of Cradle to Cradle paints to traditional eco-friendly options? I’m all for sustainability, but not if it means repainting every couple of years.
3 Likes
@SustainableSam, in my experience, Mythic Paint holds up just as well as any high-quality eco-friendly paint I’ve used. I painted my living room with it over a year ago, and it still looks fresh. Of course, proper surface preparation and application are key to longevity, regardless of the paint type.
4 Likes
I’ve been curious about Cradle to Cradle paints too. From what I’ve gathered, they’re not just about low VOCs but also about ensuring the product can be fully recycled or safely returned to the environment. It’s a whole lifecycle approach. I haven’t tried Mythic Paint yet, but the idea of having a detailed environmental impact report sounds promising. It would definitely help in making more informed choices.
2 Likes
I switched to Cradle to Cradle certified paints last year, and honestly, it’s been a mixed bag. The application is smooth, and they cover well, but I noticed they take a bit longer to dry compared to traditional eco-friendly paints. As for durability, they’ve held up pretty well so far. The biggest plus for me is knowing the entire lifecycle is considered, which aligns with my sustainability goals.
5 Likes
I’m sticking with Earthborn for now. Their Claypaint has been fantastic on my walls, and I’m a bit hesitant to switch without more concrete data on how Cradle to Cradle paints perform over time. Plus, I’m not sure if the higher cost is justified by the benefits. It would be great to see some long-term reviews or case studies comparing the two.
1 Like
The concept of Cradle to Cradle is definitely appealing, especially the emphasis on circularity. However, I wonder about the availability and cost. Are these paints easily accessible, and how do they compare price-wise to traditional eco-friendly options? Also, does anyone know if there’s a significant difference in the range of colors available?
2 Likes
I totally get where you’re coming from. It’s like, we all want to do our bit for the planet, but at the end of the day, the paint needs to do its job, right? I’ve used Mythic Paint in a couple of rooms, and while I love the ethos behind it, I did find it a bit trickier to work with compared to Earthborn. The coverage wasn’t as great, and it took more coats to get the finish I wanted. But hey, it’s all about trial and error, isn’t it?
3 Likes
Interesting take! I’ve been on the fence about trying Cradle to Cradle paints, mainly because of the price point. They seem a bit more expensive than the traditional eco-friendly options. But if they’re truly better for the environment in the long run, maybe it’s worth the investment. Has anyone done a cost comparison over time, considering factors like durability and the need for fewer touch-ups?
5 Likes
I’ve been using Auro paints for years and have been really happy with them. The colors are vibrant, and they’ve held up well over time. I looked into Cradle to Cradle paints but decided to stick with what I know works for me. It’s great that there are more options out there, though. It pushes all the brands to keep improving.
2 Likes
It’s all about priorities, isn’t it? For some, the environmental impact is the top concern, and they’re willing to compromise on ease of use or cost. For others, it’s about finding that sweet spot where you’re doing good without making your life harder. I think the key is to keep experimenting and sharing our experiences, so we can all make informed choices.
Has anyone considered the impact of the manufacturing process itself? I mean, Cradle to Cradle paints are supposed to be sustainable throughout their lifecycle, but I wonder how much energy and resources go into producing them compared to traditional eco-friendly paints. It’s something I’d like to learn more about before making a switch.
4 Likes
I switched to Cradle to Cradle paints last year for my living room project. Honestly, the durability has been impressive. It’s been over a year, and the walls still look fresh. I was worried about the same thing, but it seems like these paints are designed to last. The application was smooth too, no different from the traditional eco-friendly paints I’ve used before.
I’ve been using traditional eco-friendly paints for years and was skeptical about Cradle to Cradle at first. But after trying Mythic Paint on a small project, I was sold. The coverage and durability are on par, if not better, than what I’m used to. Plus, knowing the entire lifecycle is sustainable gives me peace of mind. It’s definitely worth considering if you’re looking for long-term solutions.
1 Like